The cursor blinks. It’s the only thing moving. The rest of the page, the project, the entire thought process is frozen, suspended at 98% completion, waiting for that last little piece to load. It never does. Instead, a semi-transparent rectangle fades into existence in the upper-right corner of the screen, a gentle notification that carries the subtle violence of a thrown brick. The sound is a polite, corporate ‘thwump’. The title is ‘Catch-up’. There are 8 attendees. The time is 4:30 PM. On a Friday.
There is no agenda. Of course, there is no agenda. An agenda would imply a purpose, a destination. This meeting isn’t a vehicle going somewhere; it’s a roundabout, designed to make everyone feel like they’re moving while ensuring no one ever leaves. We tell ourselves the problem is the lack of an agenda, the unnecessary attendees, the terrible timing. We download templates for ‘effective meetings’ and read articles about the 18-minute rule. We blame the symptoms because the disease is too terrifying to confront: our collective, institutional terror of individual accountability.
The Primordial Soup of Non-Decisions
It’s a diffusion of risk so elegant it’s almost beautiful. If a decision is made by one person in writing, the ownership is clear, singular, and dangerously exposed. But if a ‘decision’ emerges from the primordial soup of a 48-minute ‘sync,’ who is truly responsible? No one. Everyone. The Group. The decision wasn’t made; it coalesced, like lukewarm steam on a bathroom mirror. You can’t pin blame on condensation.
I used to be a purist about this. I’d decline meetings without agendas. I’d send back emails saying, “Could this be handled asynchronously?” I was, in short, insufferable. And then, I got put in charge of a project with a budget of $88,888 and a terrifyingly ambiguous goal. My first move? I scheduled a two-hour “ideation session” with 18 people. I made slides with nothing but inspirational quotes. I called it a ‘kick-off’ but it was really a ‘push-off’-me, pushing the responsibility for having the first idea onto the shoulders of a committee. It was a masterpiece of cowardly management, and I felt a profound sense of relief as I clicked ‘send’.
The problem wasn’t them. It was me. It’s almost always us.
The Astronomical Cost of Fragmented Attention
The real cost isn’t the 48 minutes of salary time multiplied by the 8 people in the room. That’s spreadsheet math. The true, astronomical cost is the fragmentation of attention. It’s the cognitive whiplash of being pulled out of a state of deep focus-that fragile, sacred space where real work happens-to participate in a performative ritual of communication. It’s not just the meeting itself; it’s the 28 minutes of dread before it and the 38 minutes of trying to find your way back to where you were after it ends.
The true, astronomical cost is the fragmentation of attention.
Minutes Meeting
Attendees
Min Dread
Min Recovery
Lily J.-C. and the Shot Palate
Think about Lily J.-C. Her job title is Quality Control Taster. She works for a small-batch chocolatier. Her palate is an instrument, insured for a ridiculous sum, capable of detecting the difference between beans harvested from the north versus the south side of a single estate. She can taste the ghost of a fermentation process that was 8 hours too short. For her to do her job, she needs stillness. She needs a clean palate and an even cleaner mind. Yesterday, in the middle of a tasting flight for a new $288-per-bar product line, her laptop chimed. It was an urgent summons to a “Quick Huddle on Q4 Synergies.”
Before: Pure Focus
🍫
Delicate notes, keen palate.
After: Palate Shot
🍫
Flattened by noise.
For the next hour, she stared at a screen of floating heads, none of whom had anything to do with cacao, while they debated the color of a presentation template. When she returned to her station, the delicate notes in the chocolate were gone, flattened by the cognitive noise. Her palate was shot for the day. The entire batch of 1,888 bars had to be re-evaluated. The cost of that meeting wasn’t 8 person-hours; it was a critical delay in a major product launch and the erosion of a master’s finely-tuned craft.
The Slow Destruction of Expertise
This is the part that never makes it into the productivity reports. The slow, grinding destruction of expertise. We are training our brains to be allergic to depth. A quick tangent: in the 1958s, corporate memos were an art form. They were dense, structured arguments, often running for several pages. They had to be, because the cost of getting a manager’s attention was high. You had to earn it with clarity and rigor. Today, the cost of demanding someone’s attention is virtually zero-just add them to the invite list. We’ve traded the high cost of thoughtful, asynchronous communication for the low, easy cost of lazy, synchronous chatter. And we’re paying a hidden, exorbitant price.
Reclaiming Sustained Focus
So what’s the fix? It isn’t another app. It’s not ‘No Meeting Fridays,’ which just leads to ‘Apocalyptic Meeting Thursdays.’ The fix is a reclamation project. It’s the personal, almost spiritual, quest to rebuild our capacity for sustained focus. It’s about finding an antidote to the constant cognitive switching. For some, it’s coding for 8 hours straight, for others it’s woodworking. For Lily, it was rediscovering a childhood passion for watercolor.
The fix is a reclamation project. It’s the personal, almost spiritual, quest to rebuild our capacity for sustained focus.
The Clear Picture of Focus
She described the feeling of her mind finally settling, the external noise fading away until the only things that existed were the paper, the water, and the pigment. It was, she said, like her brain was a video that had been stuck buffering at 98% for years, and the act of painting was the final 2% finally loading, revealing a clear, complete picture. She found that the ritual of preparing her workspace, laying out the brushes and paints she ordered from a dedicated art supply store, was as important as the act of painting itself. It was a deliberate, physical act of walling off a piece of time and attention just for herself, a space the quick syncs couldn’t penetrate.
This isn’t an argument against all meetings. Some are vital. The ones for complex negotiations, for serious human connection, for a true, last-resort collaborative brainstorm. But we use them like salt, sprinkling them over everything when we should be using them like saffron, reserved for the few occasions that truly demand their unique flavor. We’ve been conditioned to believe that presence equals progress. That a full calendar means a full day’s work. It’s a lie we tell our managers, our colleagues, and worst of all, ourselves.
The real work happens in the quiet. It happens in the uninterrupted stretches of thought, the long, slow, and sometimes frustrating process of wrestling with a problem until it submits. It happens when the cursor is blinking not because you’re waiting for a notification, but because you’re pausing to find the perfect word. The 4:30 PM Friday meeting is a symptom of a culture that has forgotten this. It’s a sign that the organization values the appearance of work over the substance of it. It’s an admission that it no longer trusts its people to work, think, and decide on their own.